IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT

SHIMLA

CMPMO No.441 of 2024

th

Decided on 15 December 2025

Bakhtawar Singh and another

…Petitioners

Versus

Smt. Charno

…Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge

1

Whether approved for reporting?

For the petitioners: Mr. Het Ram, Advocate.

For the respondent: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate,

with Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Advocate.

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral

By way of this petition, the petitioners have

assailed the order passed by the learned Trial Court dated 29.06.2024, in terms whereof, an application filed by the defendants for the amendment of the written statement has

been allowed.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that during the pendency of the Civil Suit filed by the present petitioners, an application was filed by the defendants for the amendment of the written statement. This

application is on record as Annexure P-3. It was averred in the application that the suit was pending adjudicatio.n and defendants being aged and being from village background earlier at the time of filing of written statemHent could not explain their entire version to their counsel and when detailed discussion took place with t