SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9356

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA


2025:HHC:43471

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Civil Revision No. 140 of 20P22

Reserved on 02.12.2025

Date of decision 15H.12.2025.

Dharmender ...Petitioner.

Versus

Prem Chand & others o ...Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge

Whether approved for reporting?1Yes.

For the petitioner: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate

o with Ms. Rinki Kashmiri,

Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate.

Satyen Vaidya, Judge:

The instant revision petition has been filed under

Section 24 (5) of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 (for short the ‘Act’), by the petitioner/tenant against the judgment dated 2.7.2022, passed by the Appellate Authority- III, Solan, District Solan, H.P. in Rent Appeal No. 3 ADJ-II/14 of 2019, whereby the order of eviction dated 22.2.2019, passed by the learned Rent controller-II, Solan in Rent

Petition No. 11/2 of 2015, has been affirmed. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. Rent Petition No. 11/2 of 2015 was filed by respondent No.1 herein (hereinafter referredP to as the ‘Landlord’) under Section 14 of the Act for eviction of the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the ‘tenant’) from non- residenti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top