IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No. 303 of 2015

Reserved on: 18.11.2025

Date of Decision: 15.12.2025

Hasan Ali .... Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. .... Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ Yes

For the Pe titioner : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondent/ State : Mr Ajit Sharma, Deputy

Advocate General

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the judgment

dated 01.04.2015, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Shimla (learned Appellate Court) vide which the order dated 05.07.2014, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla (learned Trial Court), extending the benefit of Probation of

1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

Offenders Act to the petitioner (accused before the learned Trial Court) was set aside. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the Learned Trial Court tried and convicted the accused Hasan Ali of the commission