IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No. 89 of 2013

Reserved on: 19.11.2025

Date of Decision: 16.12.2025.

Sanjeev Kumar f...Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. ...Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No.

For the Petitioner : Mr Ajay Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Mr Jitender Sharma,

Additional Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the judgment

dated 5.12.2012, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment of conviction dated 27.2.2009 and order of sentence dated 28.2.2009, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.2, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. (learned Trial Court)

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

were upheld and the appeal filed by the petitioner (accused before the learned Trial Court) was dismissed. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revis