IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Civil Revision No. 172 of 2018

Date of Decision: 17.12.2025

Renu Gujral .....Petitioner.

Versus

Chander Kanta (Deceased) through LRs.

…..Respondents.

Coram f

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1

For the Petitioner: Mr. Sudhi r Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

Karun tNegi, Advocate.

F or the Respondents: M r. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate.

Bipin Chander Negi, Judge

The presoent petition has been filed against the

impugnedC judgment dated 27.06.2018, passed by the learned Appellate Authority-III, Solan, District Solan, HP in a rent Appeal No.2-ADJ-II/14 of 2014, whereby the appeal

gpreferred by the present petitioner against order dated

i21.04.2018, passed by the learned Rent Controller-II,

Solan, District Solan, HP has been dismissed.

2. Heard counsel for the parties, perused the impugned order and the documents appended along with

the present petition.

3. Eviction, in the case at hand was sought on the ground of subletting. In the eviction petition, it was averred that the present petitioner/tenant was running a

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

mobile shop in the tenanted prem