IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. MMO No. 1223 of 2025

Date of Decision: 12.12.2025.

Rajat Kumar Bhalotia

.... Petitioner

Versus

Sai Tech Medicare Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

.... Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting. No.

For the petitioner : Ms Shalini Thakur, Advocate.

For the respondents : NEMO.

Rakesh Kainthla,Judge(Oral)

Heard. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated

11.12.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nahahn, District Sirmaur, H.P., (learned Trial Court) whereby one gapplication filed under Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

iSuraksha Sanhita (for short, “BNSS”) seeking recall of CW-1 for

further cross-examination, and another application under Section 358 of the BNSS for issuing notice to accused No. 3,

Symbiosis Life Sciences Ltd., were dismissed.

2. Ms. Shalini Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that she does not press the petition insofar as it relates to the dismissal of the application under Section 348 of the BNSS and confines her challenge to the order whereby the learned Trial Court had

refused to summon accused No. 3 and directed accused No. 1 to represen