Special Judge, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’), whereby the learned trial Court has framed the charges, against the petitioners.

2. In the present petiotion, the petitioners have sought the followi ng substantive reliefs amongst others: r “a. Pass an Order setting aside the entirety of the crimoinal proceedings emanating out of the Supplementary Complaint filed by the Drug Inspector before the Ld. Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nalagarh, wherein the Petitioners have been arraigned as accused persons for purported offences committed under Section 17 B, 36 AC, 18(c), 22(3), g 18A, 18B, 27(c), 27(b)(ii), 22(3), 28 and 28 A of the D & C Act, 1940 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 in Case no. 157/2024; including the order on charge dated 10.06.2024, passed by the Ld. Special Judge, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Nalagarh, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh whereby the Ld. Special Judge has passed identical orders framing charges against the Petitioners under Ss. 17-B, 36-AC, 18 (c), 27(b)(ii), 18A, 18B, 28, 28A, 22(3) and 27(D) of the D & C Act.

b. Pass an order quashing the Supplementary Prosecution Complaint filed by