IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No. 192 of 2014

Reserved on: 27.11.2025

Date of Decision: 18.12.2025.

Tara Devi and another ...Petitioners

Versus

State of HP ...Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No.

For the Petitioners : Mr. N.S. Chandel, Senior

Advocate, with Ms Shwetima

Dogra.

For the Respondent/State : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy

Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the judgment

dated 16.5.2014, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, Camp at Bilaspur (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.1.2013, passed by learned Judicial

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

Magistrate First Class, Court No. 2, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (learned Trial Court), were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court against the accused f