SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9503

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J
MUNISH DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP No.20105 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.B. Khajuria
For the Respondents: Rajan Kahol, Vishal Panwar, Ravi Chauhan, Anish Banshtu

The court held that while the employer possesses the prerogative to transfer employees, such power must be balanced with humanitarian considerations and specific Transfer Policy provisions regarding adverse family circumstances, especially in cases of severe medical emergencies of a spouse.

Headnote:The petitioner, an Assistant Director in Animal Husbandry, challenged a transfer order dated 09.12.2025 moving him from Una to Killar, a tribal area. The petitioner contended that the transfer violated the Transfer Policy of the Government of Himachal Pradesh, as his wife has been in a coma for four years and requires constant care, and he is due for retirement in less than two years. The court found that while the employer has the prerogative to post employees, the severe medical condition of the petitioner's spouse and the provisions of the Transfer Policy regarding adverse family circumstances necessitate a sympathetic approach. The primary issue was whether the transfer order could be stayed or reviewed based on humanitarian grounds and the state's Transfer Policy. The court reasoned that it would be "too harsh to compel the petitioner to leave his wife in this condition" and noted that the petitioner had already served in a hard area for four years, making the transfer to another tribal area unwarranted. respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-4) within one week from today.

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

Petitioner herein, who at present is working as Assistant Director in the office of Deputy Director, Animal Husbandry, District Una, Himachal Pradesh, is aggrieved by notification dated 09.12.2025 (Annexure P-3), whereby he has been transferred from afore station to Killar, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh.

Precisely, the grouse of the petitioner, as has been highlighted in the petition and further canvassed by Mr. K.B. Khajuria, learned counsel representing the petitioner, is that impugned transfer order is in violation of Transfer Policy because petitioner has not been permitted to complete his normal tenure at Una. While making this Court peruse notification dated 15.07.2024 (Annexure P-2), issued by Additional Secretary (AH) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. K.B. Khajuria, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that respondents, having taken note of serious illness of the wife of the petitioner, had posted him at Una, but within short span of one year and five months, he has now been transferred to Killar, District Chamba, which is a tribal area. Since wife of the petitioner is in coma for the lastt four years and there is none to take care of her, it will not be possible for the petitioner to join at Killar, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, wherein otherwise adequate medical facilities are not available. Besides above, petitioner herein is to retire within less than two years.

Having regard to the nature of prayer and order proposed to be passed in the instant petition, this Court sees no necessity to call for the reply from the respondents, who are otherwise represented by Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General. Mr. Chauhan, states that having taken note of serious medical condition of the wife of the petitioner, he was deployed at Una vide order dated 15.07.2024, but every time, it will not be possible for the department to give station of his choice, rather he is required to be posted at a station as per requirement of the department.

True it is that it is the sole prerogative of the employer to post an employee at a particular station and normal tenure of posting at one station is three years, however, this Court cannot loose sight of the fact that wife of the petitioner is seriously ill and for the last four years, she is in comma. Since patient of coma cannot be taken along by the petitioner at a transferred station, which is a tribal area, coupled with the Transfer Policy formulated by the Government of Himachal Pradesh, enables an etmployee to seek transfer/adjustment at a convenient station on the ground of adverse family circumstances, this Court sees no impediment in issuing direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-4) within one week from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall adopt sympathetic and practical approach, keeping in mind that it would be too harsh to compel the petitioner to leave his wife in this condition, who admittedly requires constant care and attention of her husband.

Till the time, representation, if any, filed by the petitioner is not decided, petitioner shall continue to work at present place of posting. Moreover, this Court finds from the pleadings adduced on record by the petitioner that he has already served in a hard area for four years, as such, he otherwise could not have been transferred to a tribal area. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top