IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CMPMO No.758 of 2025

Date of Decision : 20.12.2025

Raj Kumar

…… Petitioner

Versus

Basia and others ……Respondents

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge

Whether approved for reportingu?1

For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate.

For the respondents : Nemo.

Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral )

hThe present petition has been preferred against impugned

order dated 30.08.2025, whereby an application filed under Order 26 rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code for appointment of a Local Commissioner for demarcating the suit land

filed by the present petitioner/plaintiff, has been dismissed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned

order and the documents appended along-with the present petition.

3. In the case at hand, the present petitioner/plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the respondents. In the same, pleadings are complete and the same is fixed for settlement of the issues. It is, at this stage, that an application under Order

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

26 Rule 9 of the