IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

FAO (ORD) No.74 of 2025

Decided on: 20.12.2025

Jagdish Chand & others

…..Appellants

Versus

Lachhmi Devi and others

f .…Respondents

______________________________o_________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukrej a, Judge

1 Whether approved for reporting?

For the appellants: uMr. Lovneeesh Kanwar, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate.

For the respondents: Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice

Mr.Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for

respondent No.1.

h None for respondents No.2 to 5, 7 to 15 &

17 to 19(i) to 1((iv).

Proposed LRs No.6(a),6(b) & 16(a) to 16(c)

already ex-parte.

____________________________________________________

Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral)

The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellants/

defendants against the judgment dated 10.12.2024, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sarkaghat, District Mandi, HP, in Civil Appeal No.17 of 2021, whereby the judgment and decree dated 25.07.2018, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Court

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

No.1, Sarkaghat, District Mandi, HP, in Civil Suit No.176 of 2010, was set-aside and the matter was remanded bac