SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9533

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Chet Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Rajat ,Respondent Advocate: AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. MP(M) No. 1806 of 2025

Reserved on: 9.12.2025

Date of Decision: 20.12.2025.

______________________________________

Chet Ram f...Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh t ...Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No.

For the Petitioner : M/s Rahul Kumar, Rajat Kumar and

Omkar, Advocates.

Forh the Respondent : Mr Jitender Sharma, Additional

Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The petitioner has filed the present petition for

seeking regular bail, in FIR No. 131 of 2024, dated 17.11.2024, registered at Police Station Palampur, District Kangra, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 20, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

(NDPS Act).

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. It has been asserted that the grounds of arrest were not communicated to the petitioner. The petitioner has remained in custody for over 8 months without the effective commencement of the trial. His custody amounts to illegal pre- trial detention, which is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The recovery was eff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top