IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No.20186 of 2025

Decided on: 22.12. 2025

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Manmohan Singh and Ors …..Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors o .....Respondents

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram t

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Whether approved for reporting?1

For the Petitioners: Mr. Surender K Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant

Advocate General.

-------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral)

Notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, learned Assistant

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on

Hbehalf of the respondents.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the

parties, the matter is heard at this stage.

3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, dated 29.10.2025 & 07.11.2025 (Annexure P-2 colly), seeking applicability of judgment

Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

rendered in CWPOA No. 5536 of 2020, titled Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors, decided alongwith connec