SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9566

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA


IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT

SHIMLA

RFA No. 147 of 2015

Reserved on: 03.12.2025 Date of decision: 22.12.2025

________________________________________________

Sandeep Gupta & others

…..Appellants.

Versus f

State of H.P. & others

……Respondents.

________________________________________________

Coram

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.

1 Whether approved for reporting?

For the appellants: Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior

Advocate, with Mr. Pranjal

o Munjal, Advocate.

For Cthe respondents: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu,

Deputy Advocate General.

Sushil Kukreja, Judge.

The instant appeal has been preferred by the

appellants, who are legal heirs of the original plaintiffs before the learned Trial Court (hereinafter referred to as “the appellants”) under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for shot “CPC”) against judgment and decree, dated 12.01.2015, passed by learned Additional District Judge-II, Solan, District Solan, H.P. (hereinafter referred to “the learned Trial Court), in Civil Suit No. 3ADJ-II/1 of 2014/2007,

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

whereby the suit filed by the original plaintiffs for recovery of damages against the defendants (respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top