IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Criminal Revision No. 482 of 2025 .

Decided on: 22.12.2025 P

________________________________________________

Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner

Versus

Smt. Anjana Kanwar ….Respondent

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.

Whether approved for

reporting?o1

For the petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri,

Advocate.

For the respondent: Mr. Virender Sharma,

Advocate.

________________________________________________

Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral)

The instant petition has been filed by the

petitioner-accused under Section 438 read with Section 442 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) against judgment, dated 19.05.2025, passed by learned

Additional Sessions Judge-II, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., in

Criminal Appeal (RBT) No. 46-S/10 of 25/24, whereby whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 05.07.2024, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., in CIS Reg. No.

558/2021, was affirmed.

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. The brief facts, giving rise to the present petition, can succinctly be summarized as under:

2(a). Accus