SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9600

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA


IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT

SHIMLA

RFA No. 156 of 2014

Reserved on: 20.11.2025 Date of decision: 23.12.2025

________________________________________________ Jawala Dass. …..Appellant.

Versus

The State of H.P. & others. f ……Respondents.

_________________________

_______________________

Coram

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.

1 Whether approved for reporting?

For the appellants: Mr. B.N. Mehta, Advocate.

For the respondents/State: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional

Advocate General.

Sushil Kukreja, Judge.

The instant appeal has been preferred by the

appellant, who was the petitioner (claimant) before the learned Court below (hereinafter referred to as “the petitioner/claimant”) under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “the Act”), against award dated 26.12.2012, passed by learned District Judge, Kinnaur Civil Division at Rampur Bushahr, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Reference Court”), in Land Reference Petition No. 60 of 2006, whereby the petition filed by the petitioner/claimant, under Section 18 of the Act was allowed

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

and he was held entitled for enhanced compensation @

Rs.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top