IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

AT SHIMLA

Arbitration Case No. 384 of 202.5

Decided on : 23rd DecembPer, 2025

__________________________________________________________ Balak Ram ...Petitioner

Versus

Secretary National Highway Authfority

Delhi and another o ...Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge

1 Whether approved for rerporting? No

For the petitioner Mr. Hem Chand Sharma,

Advocate.

For the reospondents : Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate,

for respondent No.1.

C Mr. S.D. Vasudeva, Deputy

Advocate General for

respondent No.2.

hRanjan Sharma, Judge

Petitioner, Balak Ram has come up before

this Court in instant petition filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking

following relief(s):-

“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this application/petition may very kindly be allowed and the impugned order dated 05.04.2023 passed in Case No.38/19 alongwith other connected matter may kindly be set aside/quashed

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

and the time period in this case may kindly be extended and the Ld. Arbitrator- cum-Divisional Commissioner, Shimla may kindly be directed to decide the cas.e No.38/2019