IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
PAWAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent
CR.R/4145/2013
##PAGE1##
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
Cr. Revision No. 4145 of 2013
Decided on : 23.12.2025
Pawan Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.
…Respondent
___________________________________________
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
________________________________________________
For the Petitioner : Mr. Adarsh K.Vashishta,
Advocate.
For the Respondent : Mr. Rohit Sharma, Dy. A.G.
_____h________________________________________________
Virender Singh, Judge (oral)
Petitioner has filed the present revision
H petition, against the judgment, dated 31.8.2013,
passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I
Kangra at Dharamshala, H.P. (hereinafter referred to
as ‘the Appellate Court), in Criminal Appeal (RBT) No.
25-P/2010/2007, titled as ‘Pawan Kumar versus the
State of H.P.’
::: Downloaded on - 04/01/2026 04:55:07 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2
2. Vide judgment, dated 31.8.2013, the learned
Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal, filed by the.
petitioner (hereinafter referred to as ‘the convict’),
under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal HProcedure
(hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’), against the
judgment of conviction, and order of sentence, dated
1.8.2007, passed by the Court of learned Judicial
Magistrate 1st Class-1, Palampur, District Kangra, HP,
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’), in Crl. Case
No. 147-II/2005, titled as, “State of H.P. versus Pawan
Kumar”.
3. By virtue of judgment of conviction and order
of sentence, dated 1.8.2007, the learned trial Court
has convicted the convict/petitioner, for the
commission of offences, punishable under Sections
452, 506, 354 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code
(hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) and sentenced him in
the following manner:
Sections Sentence imposed In default
S. 452 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for Simple imprisonment for
a period of six months and two months.
to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000.-
::: Downloaded on - 04/01/2026 04:55:07 :::CIS
##PAGE3##3
S.506 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for Simple imprisonment for 15 days.
a period of three months
and to pay a fine of Rs.
500/- .
S. 354 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for Simple imprisonment for
a period of three months one month
and to pay a fine of Rs.
1000/-
S. 323 IPC Simple imprisonment for a Simple imprisonment for
period of three months and one month H
to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-
4. The instant revision petition has been
admitted for hearing by this Court, vide order, dated
29.10.2013.
5. Vide order, dated 25.9.2025 this Court has
ordered to call for the report of the Probation Officer.
In sequel thereto, the report of the Probation Officer
has been received.
6. hToday, statement of the convict/petitioner has
bgeen recorded on oath, in which, he has stated that he
idoes not want to press the present petition, preferred
against the judgment of conviction and prayed that
he may be released on probation.
7. The report of the Probation Officer perused.
The Probation Officer has specifically mentioned that
the conduct of the convict, during past years, in the
::: Downloaded on - 04/01/2026 04:55:07 :::CIS
##PAGE4##4
society, is good and has recommended that the benefit
under Probation of Offenders Act be given to them. .
8. The offences, for which, the convict has been
convicted, are not punishable with Hdeath or
imprisonment for life. The convict is having the
permanent abode in District Kangra, H.P. There is
nothing on the file to demonstrate that after the
incident, upon which, the FIR was registered against
the convict, any other incident, had taken place and
no subsequent offence has been committed by him.
9. The convict has already faced the agony of the
trial, in cluding the pendency of the revision petition,
for the last about twenty years.
10. Our Criminal Jurisprudence System is
reformatory in nature. With the passage of time, it has
been realized that sending the first offender to jail, to
undergo substantive sentence, does not produce good
results, as, the first offender/convict, sometimes, may
come in contact with the hardened criminals.
::: Downloaded
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.