IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT

SHIMLA

CMPMO No. 587 of 2025 a/w

CMPMO Nos.586 and 591 of 2025

th

Decided on 29 December 2025

CMPMO No.587 of 2025

Sh. Padam

…Petitioner

Versus

Ajay Sautha and another

…Respondents

CMPMO No.586 of 2025

Karan Singh

…Petitioner

Versus

Ajay Sautha and another

…Respondents

CMPMO No.591 of 2025

Tila k Kumar Budha and others

…Petitioners

Versus

Ajay Sautha and another

…Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge

Whether approved for reporting? Yes

For the petitioner(s): Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate,

with Mr. Sahil Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners(s) in all the petitions.

For the respondents: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1, in all the petitions.

Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.2, in all the petitions.

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral As common issues of fact and law are involved in these petitions and as similar ordersf have been passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, dismissing the applications filed under Ortder VI, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code by the petitioners for amending the claim petitions, the cases were heard together and are being disposed of vide common judgment.

2. Brief facts necessary f