IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Civil Revision No. 178 of 2025 a/w Civil

Revision Nos. 1H92 & 194 of 2025

Date of Decision: 30^thDecember2025

I

1. Civil Revision No.178 of 2025

Ghanshyam Sharma ……petitioner

Versus o

Sneh Kuthiala

……Respondent

2. Civil Revision No.192 of 2025

Lal Chand ……petitioner

uVersus

Sneh Kuthiala

o ……Respondent

_____________________________________________________________

3. Civil Revision No. 194 of 2025

Yoginder Kumar …… petitioner

Versus

Sneh Kuthiala

……Respondent

_____________________________________________________________

Coram:

iThe Hon’ble Mr. Justice BipinChanderNegi, Judge

HWhether approved for reporting?1

For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate.

For the respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Bhoil and Mr. Ganesh Barowalia,

Advocates.

BipinChanderNegi, Judge

All these petitions have been taken up together, as a

common question arises for consideration in the same. The common

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

question which arises for consideration is whether the personal bona fide requirement of the landlord would include accommodation for domestic help.

2. The premises in question, occupied by the petitioners/tenants, exist in the ou