IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

CMPMO No. 311 of 2024

Decided on: 05.01.2026

____________________________________________________ Om Parkash H……….. Petitioner

Versus

Sandesh Kumar & Anr. ……….Respondents _____________________________o_______________________

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chan der Negi, Judge

Whether approved for reporting? ¹

For the petitioner : Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht,

Advocate, vice Mr. B. C. Verma,

Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Senior

Advocate, with Mr. Tarun Garla,

Advocate.

_____ _______________________________________________

Bipin Chander Negi, Judge ( oral)

The present petition has been preferred against

the impugned order dated 15.01.2024, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 2, Sarkaghat, in CMA No. 787 of 2021, titled Om Prakash v. Sandesh Kumar & Ors., whereby a composite application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), read with Order I Rule 10 CPC, filed by the

present petitioner/plaintiff, has been dismissed.

2. The petitioner/plaintiff, in the case at hand, has filed a suit for partition qua Khasra No. 2537, which is

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed