IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No. 38 of 2015

Reserved on: 28.11.2025

Date of Decision: 01.01.2026.

Rajinder Singh ...Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. ...Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No

For the Petitioner : Mr Lalit Kumar Sharma,

Advocate.

For the Respondent/State : Mr Ajit Sharma, Deputy

g Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the judgment

dated 12.12.2014, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge- II, Shimla, camp at Rohru (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment of conviction dated 07.06.2011 and order of sentence dated 23.06.2011, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.2, Rohru, District Shimla, H.P. (learned

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of an offence punish