IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No. 129 of 2015

Reserved on: 18.12.2025

Date of Decision: 01.01.2026

Sant Kumar ...Petitioner

Versus o

R.K. Puri & others ...Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No

For the Petitioner : Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate.

For the Respondents : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

g The present revision is directed against the judgment

idated 31.03.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II,

Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment of conviction and order or sentence dated 24.06.2009 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.3, Mandi, District Mandi (learned Trial Court) were partly upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for

convenience.)

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the complainant filed a complaint again.st the accused before the learned Trial Court for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the