IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No. 129 of 2024

Reserved on: 16.12.2025

Date of Decision: 01.01.2026

Ravinder Kumar ...Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & another ...Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ Yes.

For the Petitioner : Mr M.A. Khan, Senior Advocate, with

o Mr. Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocate.

For the RCespondents : Mr Tarun Pathak, Deputy Advocate

General, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Yuyutsu Thakur and Manish Thakur, Advocates, for respondent

No.2.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the judgment

dated 18.01.2024, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, H.P. (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment of conviction 26.08.2023 and order of sentence dated 31.08.2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.3, Hamirpur, H.P. (learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the complainant filed a complai