SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9778

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA


IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

AT SHIMLA

Arbitration Case No.388 of 2025

Decided on: 29.12.2025

__________________________________________________________

Manjeet Singh and others

......Petitioners

Versus

The National Highway Authority of India

and others ....Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge

1Whether approved for treporting?

For the petitioners: Mr. Praveen Kumar Bhatti,

Advocate.

For the reospondents: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate vice

Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate,

C for Respondent No.1-NHAI.

Mr. S.D. Vasudeva, Deputy Advocate General, for Respondents

h No.2 and 3-State.

Ranjan Sharma, Judge

Petitioners-Manjeet Singh; Nasima Devi;

Sanjeev Kumar; and Sudershan Devi, have come up before this Court in instant petition filed under Section 29-A (4) (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

1996, seeking following relief:-

“12(i) That the period from 13-08-2025 onwards

may kindly be regularized and the mandate of the arbitrator may kindly be

extended for a reasonable time.”

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

FACTUAL MATRIX:

2. Grievance of the petitioners is that the Central Government issued a NotificatPion under the National Highways Act for acq

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top