IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT

SHIMLA

CWP No. 1116 of 2026 Decided on : 09.01.2026

Sh. Rohtash Kumar

…Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh and others

…Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge

Whether approved for reporting?

For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional

Advocate General, for

respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for

respondent No.4.

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral

i Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional

Advocate General and Mr. Vivek Sharma, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and

respondent No.4, respectively.

2. In light of the prayer made in this writ petition and the documents appended therewith, this petition is being

1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

disposed of at this stage.

3. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-

“I) Kindly call for the records of the case and issue appropriate writ, orders or dfirections, in favour of the petitioner and the respondent be directed to immediately cut-down/remove the dry and