IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 2484 of 2025 Reserved on: 16.01.2026 Date of DecisionH:23.01.2026 Aditya @ Aaditya @ Aditya Dadwal ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge.

Whether approvoed for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : M/s Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary and Panku Chaudhary, Advocate.

For the Respondent/State : Mr Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 175 of 2024, dated 28.07.2024, registered in Police Station Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., for the commission of an offence punishable under Sections 307, 324 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860.

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. It has been asserted that the petitioner was falsely implicated. The petitioner has been behind bars for more than 1 year. The charges were framed on 02.08.2025. Th.e prosecution has failed to complete the evidence, which is violative of the petitioner’s right to a speedy trial. The petitioner is a young person, and his future is a