SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 350

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
CHAMAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Arun Sehgal ,Respondent Advocate: AG AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 2720 of 2025 Reserved on: 16.1.2026 Date of Decision: 23.1.2026.

Chaman Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No.

For the Petitioner : Mr Chetan, Advocate, vice Mr Arun Sehgal, Advocate.

For the Respondent/State : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for regular bail in F.I.R. No. 89 of 2025, dated 9.7.2025, registered at Police Station, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS).

2. It has been asserted that co-accused Kishori Lal and Vinay Kumar were apprehended with 2 kilograms and 84 grams

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

of charas. The police implicated the petitioner based on the telephone calls and the relationship with the co-accused. No recovery was effected from the petitioner. The petitioner has been in custody since 11.7.2025. Ten FIRs were registered agai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top