SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 356

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
SANJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Karan Kapoor Nitish ,Respondent Advocate: AG AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 2807 of 2025 Reserved on: 16.01.2026 Date of Decision:23.01.2026 Sanjay Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?

For the Petitioner : Mr Karan Kapoor, Advocate.

For the Respondent/State : Mr Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for regular bail in F.I.R. No. 18 of 2022, dated 16.01.2022, registered at Police Station Baddi, District Solan, H.P., for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code(IPC).

2. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, the petitioner was the neighbour of the deceased. The petitioner

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

and the deceased consumed liquor on 15.01.2022 at about 5:00 PM. The deceased did not return to his room. The informant went to the petitioner’s room and found that the deceased was lying under the cot. The informant checked him and found him to be dead. The matter was reported to the police, who registered the FI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top