SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 364

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
AMAN RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Vijender Katoch Kapil Sharma ,Respondent Advocate: AG AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 3002 of 2025 Reserved on: 16.01.2026 Date of Decision: 23.01.2026.

Aman Rana ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No.

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr Kapil Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondent/State: Mr Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking regular bail in FIR No. 40 of 2025, dated 16.4.2025, registered at Police Station, Gagret, District Una, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 308(4), 324(5), 351(2), 352, 62, 111(2)(B) read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, Kanwar Sandeep Singh, Proprietor of Thakur Stone Crusher, Guglehar, filed a complaint asserting that Amrish Rana, Amit Mankotia and two other persons came to the spot on 15.4.2025 at about 10.00 PM in their vehicles bearing Registration No. HP-67- 9251 and HP-72D-0695. They stopped JCB Driver Shiv Kumar and T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top