SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 389

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
KISMAT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NHAI AND OTHERS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Karam Pal ,Respondent Advocate: AG Shreya Chauhan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Arbitration Case No: 19 of 2026.

Decided on : 09th JanuaryP, 2026 __________________________________________________________ Kismat Singh ...Petitioner Versus The Land Acquisition Officer, NHAI and another o ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge

1 Whether approved for reporting?

For the petitionuer : Mr. Karam Pal, Advocate.

For the respondent : Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No. 1.

Mr. Amit K. Chauhary, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 2 to 4. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner, Kismat Singh has come up before this Court in instant petition filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking following relief(s):-

“ That the period from 28.01.2025 onwards may kindly be extended for a reasonable time.”

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

2. Upon listing of the case today Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate and Mr. Amit K. Chaudhary, Learned Deputy Advocate General have put in appearance on behalf of respondent. No.1 & respondents No.2 and 3, respectively. They jointly submit that no reply is intended to be filed in the instant matter in v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top