IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
JAI RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.8078 of 2019 Decided on: 09.01..2026.
_____________________________________________P___________
Jai Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sha rma, Judge
1Whether approved for reporting?. f For the petitioner: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Amit K. Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral]
oPetitioner, Jai Ram, had initially filed an OriCginal Application i.e. OA No 3732 of 2016 before Learned Himachal Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal and upon abolition of the Tribunal, the same was transferred to this Court as CWPOA No.8078 of 2019, seeking the following relief(s):
(a). That respondent be directed to allow the applicant to perform his duties until he attain the age of 60 years and order of retiring the applicant the age of 58 years be declared as illegal and unconstitutional.
(b). That the respondent may kindly be directed to act in accordance with law
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
and regularize the applicant with effect from 01.01.2000 with al
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.