SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 427

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Mohit – Appellant
Versus
State of HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Vikas Rathore ,Respondent Advocate: AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 2808 of 2025 Reserved on: 01.01.2026 Date of Decision: 9.01.2026.

_____________________________________ Mohit ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate.

For the Respondent : Mr. Lokender Kutlehira, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent/State.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail, in FIR No. 237 of 2025 dated 28.10.2025, registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 20,25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) at Police Station Sundernagar District Mandi, H.P.

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. It has been asserted that, as per prosecution, the petitioner was travelling in a vehicle bearing registration No. HP- 72A-1340, from which the 329 grams of charas was recovered. The petitioner is innocent. There is no material to connect him to the charas. The petitioner is a permanent resident of Una and there is no l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top