Back
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C. J., *Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
Nuvision Commercial and Escort Services v. State of Himachal Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges eligibility of respondent. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on blacklisting and eligibility are presented. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court analyzes provisions and prior order on blacklisting. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court orders the exclusion of the respondent from tender. (Para 17) |
| 5. final decision to allow the petition and direct further proceedings. (Para 18) |
1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has primarily prayed for the following reliefs: -
"i) That a writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued for quashing the proceedings of technical evaluation of e - tender opening for security services for Zonal Hospital Mandi held on 24.04.23 Annexure P - 7, to the extent whereby the respondent No. 5 has been adjudged as qualified and has further been admitted for financial bid.
ii) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued for directing the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to carry out the tender process strictly in accordance with notice inviting tender dated 1.04.2023."
2. The case of the petitioner is that it is a partnership firm engaged in manpower supply in security services, to Government and Non - Government Insti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
