IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. : 1190 of 2026 Decided on : 29.01.2026 Kamlesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Vacation Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajender Singh Thakur, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents.

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)

Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Ahdvocate General, appears and waives service of notice on gbehalf of the respondents.

i2. In view of the controversy involved in the petition, no reply is intended to be called from the respondents.

3. The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that in pursuance of order dated 21.10.2014, he was appointed as Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) Medical, on contract basis and posted as such at Government Senior Secondary School Kolang, District Lahaul & Spiti,

1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

H.P., which is a tribal area and despite completion of 11 years, he is not being transferred to the station of .his choice.

4. Vide Of