HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
SATYEN VAIDYA, J
SH. SATINDER SINGH FULARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks rehabilitation due to the original land's legal status. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. discussion on governmental obligations as tied to legitimate expectation. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 3. court determines that neglecting to fulfill promises violates principles of fairness. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER
By way of instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for following substantive relief: -
“It is therefore respectfully prayed that keeping view the facts and circumstances of the case & in view of the submissions made here in above the present petition may kindly be allowed and the respondents may please be directed to implement annexure P-6, with a further prayer to direct the respondent No.3 to rehabilitate the petitioner to some other vacant place where in the land owned and possessed by respondent No.3 or they may please be directed to consider the case of petitioner for allotment of shop in the complex which has been constructed by respondent No.3 near Gate-I at Jawalaji, which is lying vacant, with the further prayer to provide electricity and water connection, as has been done in the cases of other similarly situated persons, named above, in order to do justice to the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.