SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9813

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
Uma Rani v. Sanjeev Vaid


1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of complaint No. 279 of 2021, titled "Sanjeev Vaid v. Smt. Uma Rani", pending before the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Paonta Sahib (learned Trial Court). (The parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint against the petitioner - accused for the commission of an offence punishable under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act). It was asserted that the accused and the complainant were known to each other. The accused required money for her domestic purposes, so she borrowed an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- from the complainant in June 2019. The accused promised to repay Rs.75,000/- in cash and the balance amount through cheque. She issued post - dated cheque dated 19.02.2021 for Rs.7,25,000/- drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Branch Bhamian Khurd, Mundian Kalan, Ludhiana, Punjab, to discharge her legal liability. The accused failed to repay the money; hence, the complainant presented the cheque to his b


























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top