IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2578 of 2026 Decided on: 05.03.2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kushagra Gautam …..Petitioner Versus Manav Bharti University and Ors. .....Respondents -----------------------------------------------o--------------------------------------

Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal tDua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with o Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Ms. Kanta Devi, Advocate, for respondent No. 1.

Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 2 & 3.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge i Notice. Ms. Kanta Devi, learned counsel and Mr.

Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and

2 & 3, respectively.

2. In view of the grievances, documents appended alongwith the writ petition and nature of order being passed

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

hereinafter, reply of the writ petition is not required to be