IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
JYOTI SHARMA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND ANR – Respondent
CRMMO/1039/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CrMMO No. 1039 of 2025
Date of Decision: 3.3.2026
_____________________________________________________________________
Jyoti Sharma and Ors.
……...Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for
reportin
g?
For the Petitioners: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional
Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr.
Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for
Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma, Advocate, for
respondent No.2/complainant.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of instant petition, prayer has been made by the
ipetitioners for quashing of FIR No. 0035 date 25.5.2023, registered under
Sections 323, 498-A, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal
Code in PS Darlaghat, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, as well as
consequent proceedings, if any, pending before the court below, on the
basis of compromise/amicable settlement arrived inter-se parties.
::: Downloaded on - 05/03/2026 22:30:35 :::CIS
##PAGE2##2
2. Precisely, the case of the petitioner, as emerges from the
pleadings is that the FIR sought to be quashed in the instant proceedings
came to be lodged at the behest of respondent No.2 (hereinafter,
‘complainant’), who alleged that her marriage was solemnized with
petitioner No.3 namely Shekhar Sharma on 17.1.2017 and out of their
wedlock, three children were born. Since on account of matrimonial
discord, they were unable to live together, respondent No.2-wife left her
matrimonial house and started rliving with her parents in May 2023. After
her having left the matrimonial house, she lodged afore FIR, alleging
therein that after her moarriage with petitioner No.3-Shekhar Sharma, she
was constantly haCrassed and tortured by the accused named in the FIR for
bringing less dowry.
3. Though after completion of the investigation, police presented
chagllan in the competent court of law, but before same could be taken to its
logical end, petitioner No.3-husband and respondent No.2-wife have
resolved to settle their dispute amicably. In the aforesaid background,
petitioners have approached this court in the instant proceedings, praying
therein for compounding the offence alleged to have been committed by them.
4. Respondent No.2 states on oath that she of her own volition
and without there being external pressure, has entered into compromise
::: Downloaded on - 05/03/2026 22:30:35 :::CIS
##PAGE3##3
with the petitioners, whereby they have resolved to settle thei.r dispute
amicably inter-se them. She deposed that FIR in question is result of mis-
understanding and since petitioners have apologized for their misbehaviour
and undertaken not to repeat such mistake in future, she shall have no
objection in case FIR as well as consequent proceedings initiated at her
behest, are quashed and set-aside and the accused are acquitted of the
charges framed against them. She sh all also withdraw all the cases filed at
her behest against the petitionerrs on account of amicable settlement. Her
statement is taken on record.
5. Petitioners namely Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Ms. Shikha Sharma, Mr.
Shekhar Sharma Cand Ms. Suresh Rani, who are present in the Court, while
fairly acknowledging factum with regard to compromise also state that in
terms of hthe compromise arrived inter-se parties, they shall take due care of
the respondent/complainant and in no eventuality, she will be
harassed/maltreated. Petitioner No.3 Shekhar Sharma, states on oath that
he being husband of the respondent/complainant would ensure that all
basic necessities of his wife as well as children are met with and he lives
happily with them. Their such statement made on oath is taken on record.
6. Having heard the statement made on oath by respondent No.2-
complainant, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General
::: Downloaded on - 05/03/2026 22:30:35 :::CIS
##PAGE4##
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.