IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. : 793 of 2025 Decided on : 27.02.2026 Anoop Kumar & Others …Petitioners Versus Virender f…Respondent The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 t For the petitioners : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate.

For the respondent : None.

Virender Singh, Judge The petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of thhis Court by filing the present petition under Article 227 gof the Constitution of India, with a prayer to set aside the order dated 11.11.2024, passed by learned Civil Judge, Kandaghat, District Solan H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the “trial Court’), in CMA No. 29-K/6 of 2024, which was filed in Civil Suit No. 09-K/1 of 2024, titled as “Varinder Vs Anoop Kumar & Others”.

2. By way of the order dated 11.11.2024, the learned trial Court has allowed the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 C.P.C., directing the parties to maintain

1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

status quo qua the nature, ownership and possession of the suit land, till the pendency of the litigation. .

3. This order has been upheld by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-1 Solan,H H.