IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SH.IMLA Cr.MMO No.1191 of 2025 Date of Decision: 06.03.2026 ____________________________________________________.___________________

Het Ram ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?

_______________________________t___________________________________________

For the Petitioner: Ms. Seema Sood, Advocate, as Legal Aid Counsel.

For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Anish Banshtu, CDeputy Advocate General, for State.

_______________________________________________________________________

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

By way of instant petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, prayer has been made on behalf of petitioner that the sentences Hawarded to him, by the various Courts, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short ‘the Act’) in 2 cases may kindly be ordered to be run concurrently.

2. Petitioner stands convicted in 2 cases, as detailed herein below :

Sh. Amboj Sood”

2. Criminal Appeal No.3 of Learned Additional Sessions

2025, titled as “Het Ram Vs. Judge, Kullu, District Kullu