IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr .MP(M) No.307 of 2026 Date of Decision : 20.03.2026 Ankush Kumar @ Gharati …… Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ……Respondent Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate.

For the Respondent : Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General.

Sub Inspector Pawan Kumar, Police Station, Mcleodganj, District Kangra is present along-with record.

Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)

The present bail petition has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS for grant of regular bail, in FIR No.14 of 2024, dated 21.03.2024, registered at Police Station, Mcleodganj, District Kangra, H.P., under Sections 302, 323, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the record and the status report.

3. In the case at hand, a telephonic information was received in Police Station, Mcleodganj from the hospital that an individual belonging

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

to the State of Punjab has been brought to the hospital and he has dead. On receiving the aforesaid information, the police rushed to the Zonal Hospital, Dharamshala. The informant, in the case at hand, is one Harmanpreet Singh, who got recorded his statement under Section 154 Cr.PC. As per the informant, on 20.03.2024, he along with his elder brother Navdeep Singh, brother-in-law Gagandeep Singh and their friend Sandeep Awan had come to Mcleodganj in vehicle bearing No. PB-36H-

7127.

4. At Mcleodganj, they had stayed at hotel named OM Palace at Bhagsunag. On 21.03.2024 for having breakfast, they had gone to the Aryan Coffee Shop. When they were sitting inside the coffee shop, the owner of the shop had asked them to refrain from consuming alcohol in his coffee shop. Informant along with others had informed the coffee shop owner i.e., Hoshiar Singh that they would not be consuming alcohol in the morning.

5. Upon this, an altercation took place inside the coffee shop. While the altercation was taking place inside coffee shop, the son of the coffee shop owner, i.e., Aryan also arrived on the spot. The father, son duo pushed the informant along with Navdeep, Gagandeep and Sanjeev Avan outside the coffee shop. Once they were outside the coffee shop, Hoshiar Singh owner of the coffee shop loudly insinuated against the aforesaid four individuals.

6. On hearing Hoshiar Singh, coffee shop owner shouting at the aforesaid four individuals, his relatives Ankush Kumar @ Garati (bail petitioner), Ankush Kapoor, Kunal Neharia @ Sagar, Vicky, taxi operator Raman Kumar @ Banta and one Ajay Kumar rushed towards the coffee shop. Ajay Kumar accused, Ankush Kumar @ Garati (bail petitioner), Hoshiar Singh and accused Aryan got hold of deceased Navdeep Singh outside the coffee shop.

7. The other individuals including Kunal Nehria @ Sagar started beating Harmanpreet Singh, Gagandeep Singh, Sanjeev Ayan and pushed them towards rain shed, in the ensuing scuffle. As per the own case of the prosecution, insofar as the scuffle with the deceased Navdeep Singh is concerned, only Ankush Kumar @ Garati (bail petitioner), Hoshiar Singh and Aryan, coffee shop owners are said to have been involved.

8. Investigation in the case at hand is complete. Challan stands filed on 06.06.2024. No recoveries are to be effected from the petitioner. Insofar, as Hoshiar Singh and Aryan are concerned, they had filed separate bail petitions bearing Cr.MP(M) No.2823 of 2025 & 2824 of 2025, respectively. The same were allowed vide judgment dated

27.02.2026.

9. The Supreme Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 has observed that personal liberty of an individual is a precious fundamental right and should not be curtailed unless it is imperative in the given facts and circumstances.

10. No doubt, the allegations are serious but these are mere allegations and at this stage, presumption o