IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 253 of 2024 .

Date of decision: 19.03.2026.

The Pr. Secy. Revenue to the Govt. of H.P. & othe.rs ...Appellants.

Versus Parkash & others ...Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.

Whether approved for rerporting?1 For the appellants : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

For the respondents : Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate.

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral):

h The present appeal arises out of the judgment and gdecree, dated 27.12.2023 as passed by the learned District iJudge, Bilaspur, H.P. in Civil Appeal No. 49/13 of 2023, whereby the appeal preferred by the present appellants/defendants has been ordered to be dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 01.01.2021, as passed by the learned Civil Judge, Bilaspur, H.P. in Civil Suit No. 161-1 of 2015, titled as Parkash & others vs. The Principal Secretary, Revenue & others, have been affirmed, whereby the suit filed by

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the

judgment?

the plaintiffs/respondents for declaration and mandatory injunction was decreed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs/respondents filed a suit for declaration and