Whether approved for reporting? 1^{Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes} Yes.

Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge

By way of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, petitioner has assailed impugned order dated 09.02.2026 (Annexure P-8) passed by Principal Secretary (Urban Development) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh and notification dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-10) for inclusion of Village Saletar of Gram Panchayat Amb Pathiar in proposed Municipal Council Jawalamukhi, issued by respondents, alleging the same to be arbitrary,illegal, and violative of Part-III of the Constitution of India.

2. This is the second round of litigation. The respondents had notified proposal for converting Nagar Panchayat Jawalamukhi into Municipal Council by including Village Saletar of Gram Panchayat Amb Pathiar vide notification dated 23.11.2024 (AnnHexure P-1), inviting objections from affected persons through Deputy Commissioner,Kangra, within a period of two weeks. f

3. Petitioner had filed objections against inclusion of Village Saletar of Gram Panchayat Amtb Pathiar in the proposed Municipal Council, Jawalamukhi, on the ground that majority of residents of the area are dependent upon agriculture and, after inclusion in the Municipal Council, the farmers will suffer adverse effects. The local circumstances and realities have been overlooked, and the economic condit ions and activities of the rural area have been ignored. The office- bearers of the Panchayat and local residents were not consulted, and the decision was taken without consent of the community. The inclusion of the concerned area in the Municipal Council shall result in burden on the rural population, and they will be subjected to a complicated administrative system, leading to problems for the rural population. Such inclusion shall also have adverse impact on the economic condition of the villagers and small entrepreneurs, and the area will loseits cultural identity due to threat to local traditions and lifestyle.

4. Vide notification dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P-4), Department of Urban Development, Government of Himachal Pradesh, after receiving objections from inhabitants of the local areas,constituted Municipal Council Jawalamukhi.

5. The aforesaid notification was assailed by the petitioner by filing CWP No.6313 of 2025 (Suman Lata vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.), which was decided on 18.12.2025 (Annexure P-6) by quashing and setting aside the notification dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P-4), with directions to Secretary, Urban Development, to consider the objections of thet petitioner and to take appropriate decision in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably on or before 10.01.2026, by passing a reasoned andspeaking order after providing personal hearing to the petitioner.

6. In sequel to aforesaid order, the objections filed by the petitioner were considered and decided by Principal Secretary (Urban Development) to Government of Himachal Pradesh, vide office order dated 09.02.2026 (Annexure P-8), after giving personal hearing to the petitioner, whereby the objections filed by the petitioner have been rejected and fresh final notification dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-10) for constitution of Municipal Council Jawalamukhi with inclusion ofvillage Saletar has again been issued.

7. In the aforesaid background, present petition has been filed assailing impugned order dated 09.02.2026 (Annexure P-8) andnotification dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-10).

8. Respondents have defended the constitution of the Nagar Panchayat in reference, by submitting that the impugned notification was issued after fulfilling all legal formalities, by exercising the powers conferred upon them for better developmeHnt and improved arrangements in the area in reference, after giving due consideration to the objections raised by local inhabitants anfd to fulfill the long-standingdemand of large number of people of the are