IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.371 of 2025 Date of decision: 01.04.2026 Jhabe Ram ...Petitioner.

Versus Mamta ...Respondent.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : rMr. Tek Chand, Advocate.

For the respondent : Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, vice Mr.Raman Jamalta, Advocate.

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral):

The present petition arises out of order, as passed by lhearned District Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. dated 02.05.2025, gwhereby the application filed by the present respondent under Section

5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal has been allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant/respondent. It was averred that the defendant is a stranger to the suit land, who has bought a small piece of land, adjacent to Khasra No.719 i.e. under Khasra No.718 along with other co-sharers to the extent of 1/6^th share i.e. 00-01-03 bighas land out of total land

1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the

judgment?

measuring 00-07-00 bighas. On Khasra No.718, there are two