IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

LPA No. 916 of 2025 Date of decision: 16.04.2026 Anand Moudgil …Appellant Versus State Statutory Body Regional Transport fAuthority & Ors.

o …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice.

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin C. Negi, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?

For the Appellant: Appellant in person.

For the Respondents: Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.

G. S. Sandhawalia , Chief Justice (Oral)

LPA Nos. 917 & 922 of 2025 Delinked.

LPA No. 916 of 2025

2. The challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is to the order passed by the learned Single Judge passed in CWP No. 7773 of 2025, titled as Anand Moudgil vs. The Statutory Body, Regional Transport Authority, Shimla & Anr., decided on 22.11.2025. The learned Single Judge though had decided two other writ petitions with which we would deal with at on another date.

3. However, while dismissing the writ petitions, it was noticed that the said Court was bound by the findings of the earlier Division Bench in CWP No. 3741 of 2020, titled as Anand Moudgil vs. The Chairman, State Transport Authority of Himachal Pradesh and, therefore, the learned Single J