2026:HHC:12255 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 480 of 2024 .

Reserved on: 07.04.2026 Date of decision : 29.04.20.26.

Lachhmi Ram ...Petitioner.

Versus Roop Ram f ...Respondent.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rom esh Verma, Judge Whether approved for rerporting?1 For the petitioner u : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the responodent : Mr. Nand Lal Chauhan, Advocate.

Romesh Verma, Judge:

The present petition arises out of the judgment, as passed by the learned District Judge, Shimla, dated 14.05.2024, whereby the appeal, as preferred by the present petitioner, was partly allowed and both the parties were directed to maintain status quo qua the nature, possession and construction over the suit land/property comprised in Khasra No. 436, measuring 00-01-62 hectares (Gair Mumkin Abadi), situated at Hadbast No.66, Mohal Manghech, Mauza Manghech, Tehsil and District Shimla, H.P., till the final disposal of the suit.

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the

judgment?

2. The facts of the case are that the plaintiff/respondent filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, restraining the defendant from raising construction or changing the nature of