SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 1864

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
RAGHU VAKKIYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Janesh Gupta ,Respondent Advocate: AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SH.IMLA Cr.MMO Nos.1296 & 1199 of 2022 Reserv.ed on: 07.04.2026 Date of Decision: 18.04.2026 _______________________________________________________________________

1. Cr.MMO No.1296 of 2022 Raghu Vakkiyal o ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …....Respondent

2. Cr.MMO No.1199 of 202r2 Raghu Vakkiyal ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …....Respondent Coram C Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? Yes.

_______________________________________________________________________

gFor the Petitioner: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Mr. Rajesh Batra and Ms.

Sonia Kukreja, Advocates, in both the petitions.

HFor the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State, in both the petitions.

_______________________________________________________________________

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Since common questions of facts and law are involved in both the above captioned cases, this Court after having clubbed the same, heard them together and are now being disposed of vi.de common judgment.

2. By way of above-captioned pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top