IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 29 of 2013 Reserved on: 31.3.2026 Date of Decision: 22.04.2026 Lekh Raj (since deceased) through LRs ...Appellants Versus Kamal Kumar ...Respondent Coram r Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ Yes.

For the Appellants : Mr Mohinder Verma, Advocate.

For the Respondent : Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior h Advocate, with Mr Divya Raj Singh, Advocate.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 27.11.2012, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Una, H.P. (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.1, Una, H.P. (learned Trial Court), were partly set aside. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rHise to the present appeal are that the plaintiff filed a civil suit before the learned Trial Court for recovery of arrears of rent of ₹21,000/- and ejectment of the defendant from the