IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 43 of 2015 Reserved on: 12.03.2026 Date of Decision: 22.04.2026.

Dalel Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. t ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ Yes.

For the Petitioner : Mr Surya Chauhan, Advocate.

For the respondent/State : Mr Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 24.01.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Una, H.P. (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.09.2012 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Una (learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving Hrise to the present revision are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offences punishable under Section 279, 337 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It was asserted